<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Marketing Blog&#187; Internet Law</title>
	<atom:link href="https://modularinternetmarketing.com/tag/internet-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://modularinternetmarketing.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 21:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.35</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Google &#8211; Verizon Deal. &#8211; Why Net Neutrality is not a Topic of the Month?</title>
		<link>https://modularinternetmarketing.com/361/google-verizon-deal-why-net-neutrality-didnt-make-it-topic-of-the-month-for-us</link>
		<comments>https://modularinternetmarketing.com/361/google-verizon-deal-why-net-neutrality-didnt-make-it-topic-of-the-month-for-us#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Marketing]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://modularinternetmarketing.com/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and Verizon will announce a deal that the New York Times describes &#8220;could allow Verizon to speed some online content to Internet users more quickly if the content&#8217;s creators are willing to pay for the privilege&#8221;. We believe that the best and the worse in this area has already been done already and now [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><span>Google and Verizon will announce a deal that the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/05/technology/05secret.html?_r=1&amp;hp" target="_hplink"><span>New York Times</span></a> describes</span></span><span><span> </span></span><span><span>&#8220;could allow Verizon to speed some online content to Internet users more quickly if the content&#8217;s creators are willing to pay for the privilege&#8221;.</span></span><span></span></p>
<p><span>We believe that the <span>best and the worse</span> in this area has <span>already</span> been done already and now we just carefully watch where this is going. We are web people <span>who</span> <span>are aware</span> what this type of deal may mean for us vs huge corporations. For now it looks like another Googlenet story which <span>may</span> or may not be a huge problem&#8230; stay tuned for more news from <span>the</span> Verizon-Google-Obama Administration <span>f</span>ront.</span></p>
<p><strong style="font-weight: bold;"><span><strong><span>Net Neutrality The Worst up to date</span></strong></span></strong><strong></strong><span>:<br />
<span>The</span> confusion in <span>the</span> US after FCC vs Comcast over Net Neutrality case (2008-2010) which ended in early April 2010. Federal Communication Commission fined Comcast for blocking BitTorrent <span>usage</span>. Comcast won only because they proved in <span>the</span> U.S Court of Appeals that <span>the</span> FCC has no authority to give such a fine. <span>Imagine: b</span>roadband service isn&#8217;t currently defined as Telecommunication! – Shocked<span>?</span> &#8211; me too<span>!</span><br />
Of course this confusion allows companies <span>to</span> talk about possible deals<span>.</span></span></p>
<p><strong style="font-weight: bold;"><span><strong><span>The best on Net Neutrality front up to date</span></strong></span></strong><strong></strong><span>:<br />
The Paccific Telegraph Act from 1860 says &#8220;Massages received from any individual, company, corporation&#8230; shall be impartially transmitted in order of their reception&#8221;. This says it all and if current congress will be able to pass <span>an</span> update to this act and extend it to broadband services we are all good. Of course before this happens we have <span>m</span>onths of <span>l</span>obb<span>y</span>ing and <span>p</span>ressures on Congressman.</span></p>
<p><strong style="font-weight: bold;"><span><strong><span>The biggest unknown on Net Neutrality <span>up-to-dat</span></span></strong></span></strong><strong></strong><span>e:</span><span><br />
Obama&#8217;s Administration &#8211; which is trying to patch law and ensure Net Neutrality for the future. Is <span>the</span> president strong enough to gain support from US Congress? Is he interested enough to make an effort? We don&#8217;t know.</span></p>
<p><span>So we have <span>the typical pressure, lobbying and race between</span> <span>Government</span>/Regulators and Industry itself<span>,</span> which is <span>going</span> to make sure trade standards are faster than regulator&#8217;s law<span>.</span></span></p>
<div id="attachment_362" style="width: 310px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="http://modularinternetmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/google-verizon-obama.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-362" title="google-verizon-obama" src="http://modularinternetmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/google-verizon-obama-300x244.jpg" alt="Google-Verizon Deals and Net Neutrality Guards" width="300" height="244" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google-Verizon Deals and Net Neutrality Guards</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://modularinternetmarketing.com/361/google-verizon-deal-why-net-neutrality-didnt-make-it-topic-of-the-month-for-us/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
